Administrator (Former Employee) – Bradford – 16 May 2018
Administration everyday task : letters ,phones, txt, book appointments via S1 Finance side of job - invoices to be checked and inputted mail merges to GP, send out information to the GP of data that we had recieved for them to be able to send out invoices The work colleges were lovely and friendly the hardest part of my job was not being able to ever improve myself with a proper qualification that would help me move up the ladder
Commercial Business Advisor (Former Employee) – London, Greater London – 16 March 2018
As a contractor I found PHE to be a good place to work in general and a good career experience. Bearing in mind this still a fairly young government organisation it operates at highly professional standard.
IS & IT Operations Manager (Former Employee) – London – 23 January 2018
Often busy with projects and BAU learned to deal with difficult situations. Worked with the management structure which changed frequently Organisational culture in development due to merging of several ALB's into PHE Difficulties with providing continued work flow due to equipment limitations and fit for purpose equipment Working with the staff user base and providing one to one support to users
Executive Officer (Former Employee) – London – 12 October 2017
PHE has good pay and working hours, you have to work with very talented and interesting people whom are at the top of their field. There is a good job satisfaction when working at PHE because you know that you are working towards improving people's lives.
Assistant (Former Employee) – Birmingham – 28 August 2017
We researched what the publics health was like in the U.K. We had conversations with those that work there and told us what and how they contribute to helping the the health of all the people in the U.K.
Awful miserable place with non caring directors/deputy directors
Non-clinical role (Former Employee) – Nottingham, Nottinghamshire – 18 August 2017
Worked here for 8 years and the place went from bad to worse. Clinical staff paid to "direct" with no apparent skills or qualifications in management, let alone strategy or directing human beings. A lot of the staff were miserable and stressed and whilst the work in itself was interesting, however hard you try, the people and process get you down. Directors/deputy directors turn a blind eye to this and stamp their feet to get what they want. Bad place to work .
Type of work interesting
Directors and deputy directors have no human qualities, of apparent management experience-they are clinical
Various Roles (Former Employee) – Northern England – 20 July 2017
Pros – good if you like going to meetings, team building exercises, over complicating statistics, rail travel to London.
Cons – over staffed and large amount of work is created by internal processes and meetings rather than the public good. 7 year pay freeze, London centred, very left leaning, and cringe worthy amounts of virtue signalling. Good also if you want to continue your academic career your colleagues can pick up after you whilst you do your own thing. Public Health England is 1/3 genuinely caring people who wish to make a change, 1/3 woolly liberals who like meetings and would be unemployed otherwise, 1/3 career types who no longer use the English language in the same context as ordinary people understand it.
Biomedical Scientist (Former Employee) – Whitechapel then Colindale – 21 June 2017
Typical day at work includes grasping the primary, once you have understood this then you understand the Hain then appreciate the DSTs and possibly the third lines DSTs. The management and team is very supportive understanding and loyal.
Work is time dependant, i.e. Hain. The earlier you start the better.
Good culture of training and developing new staff.Large organisation but with a friendly atmosphere. Varied work that is both challenging and interesting. Occasionally long hours and career progression can be slow due to government cuts and downsizing.
Biomedical Scientist- Molecular Laboratory (Current Employee) – Newcastle upon Tyne – 26 May 2017
If you're looking to become a Biomedical Scientist look elsewhere, the NHS for instance. Staff there are paid quite a bit more, therefore PHE suffers from staff retention and the employment of new staff. A while ago laboratory staff were changed to civil service staffing structure. Due to the threat of closure we chose not to change to new terms and conditions as the redundancy package was far worse. No pay rise since 2014. Low and behold they are changing the lab management to an NHS provider which has no obligation to increase our pay. As a civil servant you are required to take meaningless courses on nothing to do with your actual job, more office based courses which are compulsory and useless. Management either don't know what is going on or lie. The list goes on...
Health protection work is interesting and often changing. Most people are lovely to work with and the values are good. I have worked for PHE for 11 years - there have been so many changes in the job role plus the location has changed twice. I have adapted to the changes and the move.
High workload, lack of recognition, poor management
Biomedical Scientist (Current Employee) – Southampton – 24 May 2017
The organisation as a whole is more concerned with public image than staff, which are their best asset. The pay for a BMS is less than NHS, and job adverts give the impression that pay is on a scale depending on experience. This is not the case, and you do not move up the pay scale unless you are excellent in your appraisal. Only 3% of civil servants are 'allowed' to be awarded excellent, and evidence must be approved. MLA salary is less than what you would earn at a supermarket. Plus you loose your NHS T&C and pension. There is so much bureaucracy- this is something PHE do well! Workload is High, poorly organised and very stressful. Staff are constantly dumped on & morale is exceptionally low. We are all looking for employment elsewhere. The average turn around of staff is 18 months. Get experience then leave is my recommendation.
Assistant Healthcare Scientist (Former Employee) – London – 3 May 2017
The company is more interested in constantly changing the names of the departments that you are working in or moving your place of work than actually keeping staff. Nobody feels valued. Having started in June and the yearly appraisals being in May, I had to wait a whole 23 months before I got my lousy 1% pay rise. The high up management are constantly trying to feed you jargon about what the company is doing, where in reality they are lying to you and selling you out to save money. For a company that is supposed to embrace staff advancement, I wasn't allowed to train for a role above me because it wasn't required for my current role. Go figure.
Work area very cold. Staff individually very helpful, but collectively appear unhappy with their workload. As a short term contractor, I was often left with very little to do, as the permanent staff did not have time to instruct in all aspects or procedures of the job.
EO (Former Employee) – Colindale, Greater London – 6 February 2017
A typical day at work would be to process incoming work and manage the flow of daily workload. I learned a great deal as it was my first official job:- time management, team work and SOPs. I was a specialist in my field and provided results second to none with respect to my role. Management tend to get lost in themselves and pay no attention to the needs of their staff. In all honesty, the management mentality at PHE were more along the lines of "organised gangs". Workplace staff were all very unhappy and unsure of where to go and what to do about it! No employee morale, solidarity in tatters due to cuts and lack of funding by government. No aspect of the job was especially difficult apart from workload change due to seasonal change. Most enjoyable part of the job was learning new techniques and being a part of the cause and effort against health inequalities. The staff leaving do's were also quite enjoyable, as there were so many!
on site cafeteria, good cause, positive impact in public health